Polymer concrete coating for pipe, tubular shapes, other metal members and metal structures

ABSTRACT

The improved coating of the present invention provides a protective coating for pipe, tubular shapes, other metal members, and metal structures. The protective coating comprises a polymer concrete, which is preferably a mixture of an organic resin, a filler material and a chemical activator. The organic resin is preferably a mixture of thermosetting polymer resins, such as bisphenol A based epoxy, bisphenol A based epoxy blended with polyglycol di-epoxide, and polyglycol di-epoxide. The filler material may be calcium carbonate, silica flour, zeosphere, talc, or kaolin, and preferably is of up to 200 mesh in size. The chemical activator preferably is an amine, such as aminoethylpiperazine or tetraethylene pentamine. The protective coating may be prepared by the process comprising the steps of combining and then heating the organic resin and filler material, mixing the organic resin and filler material with the chemical activator to create a polymer concrete, spraying the polymer concrete on the metal member or structure, and protecting the sprayed polymer concrete for a polymerization period.

This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/039,521 filedMar. 29, 1993, U. S. Pat. No. 5,464,886 which a continuation of U.S.Ser. No. 07/600,543 filed Oct. 19, 1990, now abandoned.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to an improved polymer concrete coatingfor pipe, tubular shapes, other metal members, and metal structures toprotect the member or structure and any subcoating, such as corrosionprotection coatings.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Often, to protect pipe, other metal members or metal structures, theouter surface of the object is coated. There are many coatings used forprotection, including a variety of epoxies. For example, the outersurface of a steel pipe, when used in an outdoor application, isnormally provided with a corrosion resistant coating, such as a fusionbonded epoxy coating. Federal law requires that underground pipelines beprovided with a corrosion coating and that the corrosion coating beintact prior to installation. 49 C.F.R. §§192.451-192.491 (1989). Oftenthere are manufacturing defects in pipe that prevent the corrosioncoating from being continuous. These defects, called "slivers," aresimilar to splinters in wood or burrs in the pipe steel. The "slivers"are large enough that the fusion bonded epoxy corrosion coating does notcover them, resulting in "holidays" or holes in the coating. Moreover,often there are so many "slivers" and resulting "holidays" that thecoating cannot be "patched" and the pipe cannot be installed. Efforts todevelop a cost effective means for salvaging such pipe have not beensuccessful. For example, it is not cost efficient to remove a fusionbonded epoxy coating, refinish the surface of the pipe to eliminate the"slivers," and then recoat the pipe. Even if the pipe is recoated, the"holidays" often reappear. Thus, there is a need for a cost efficientmeans to repair fusion bonded epoxy corrosion protection coatingsriddled with "holidays" created by "slivers."

In addition to corrosion protection, when the pipe is buried in theground the pipe is often further protected. For instance, at undergroundroad crossings, the pipe is usually enclosed within a tubular metalcasing and is supported within the casing by a mechanical device knownas a pipeline casing insulator. In addition to supporting the pipe, thepipeline casing insulator prevents damage to the pipe and any pipecoating when the pipe is drawn through the casing during installation,and it electrically insulates the pipe from the casing.

A typical example of a metal pipeline casing insulator is illustrated inPipeline Casing Insulators, Casing End Seals and Wall Penetration Seals,Section 100, Bulletin No. 14825 12/85, Maloney Pipeline Products Co. of5200 Cedar Crest, Houston, Tex. 77087. The components of such a pipelinecasing insulator, the band, the rubber liner, the runners and themounting hardware, are provided as separate components that arerelatively expensive and that require time consuming field assembly.Additionally, the metallic components of such a pipeline casinginsulator can damage the integrity of the corrosion resistant coatingduring assembly. A pipeline casing insulator utilizing polymer concrete,as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,736, however, requires no fieldassembly and is less expensive than typical metal pipeline casinginsulators. Moreover, it contains no metal parts that could damage thepipe coating during attachment or later interfere with cathodicprotection.

Although the polymer concrete pipeline insulator solved problemsassociated with traditional pipeline casing insulators, the utilizationof casings at underground crossings is expensive and time consuming.Thus, it is desirable to install pipelines at underground road crossingswithout the use of casings. The method of installing pipelines atunderground road crossings without casings is commonly referred to asthe "slick bore" method. Alternatives for protecting the pipe coatingduring "slick bore" installation have been tried, but none of theseprior alternatives are without problems.

One prior alternative for protecting pipe during "slick bore"installation is to coat the outer surface of the pipe, in addition toany corrosion coating, with portland cement concrete. The portlandcement concrete coating is usually a minimum of 1 1/2"-2" in thickness.The diameter of the pipe, therefore, is increased by a minimum of 3"-4".Thus, a larger diameter bore for the underground crossing is requiredfor the portland cement coated pipe than for pipe not coated withportland cement concrete. The increase in the bore diameter increasesthe cost of installation. Additionally, because of the heavy coating ofportland cement concrete, the weight of the pipe is greatly increased.The increase in weight increases the shipping costs of the pipe, ifcoated prior to shipment to the field, increases the difficulty ofinstallation, and increases the risk of damage to the pipe structureduring installation of the pipe. Moreover, the portland cement coatingprocess, including application and setting or preliminary curing,typically requires several days to be completed. It is a time consumingalternative.

Another prior alternative for protecting pipe during "slick bore"installation is to increase the thickness of a corrosion coating, suchas a fusion bonded epoxy coating. Even with the increase in thickness ofthe coating, however, the pipe corrosion coating is usually damagedduring installation to the extent that "holidays" in the coating result.Thus, the integrity of the corrosion coating is not maintained.

As with installation at underground crossings, when pipe is buried in arocky terrain, the pipe and any coating must be protected. Generally,the prior art rocky terrain protection systems are installedmechanically, such as with tape. One such rocky terrain protectionsystem is described in Pipe Protection Materials, Standard Rock Shield,Protective Padding, Rock Shield Tape #400, Pressure Sensitive, PP-794-18, Johns-Manville, Ken-Caryl Ranch, Denver, Colo. 80217. Fieldinstallation of such prior art rocky terrain protection systems is timeconsuming and labor intensive. Not all rocky terrain protection systemsare installed in the field. One such system is described in Rock Jacket,Shaw Jacket Systems by Shaw Pipe Protection Limited of 25 BethridgeRoad, Rexdale, Ontario, Canada M9W 1M7. The Rock Jacket System includesa reinforced wire mesh coating and an outer tape wrap. The Rock Jacketsystem absorbs water so that it conducts electricity.

Just as is the case when pipe is installed at underground crossings, itis possible to protect pipe in rocky terrain by portland cement concretecoatings. As described above, however, portland cement concrete coatingsincrease the weight of the pipe and are time consuming to install.

One object of the present invention is to provide an improved coatingthat eliminates the need for casing and pipeline casing insulators forinstallation of pipe at underground crossings, without greatlyincreasing the weight of the pipe and without increasing the risk ofdamage to the pipe structure and any subcoating during installation.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an improvedcoating that protects pipelines and any subcoatings, such as fusionbonded epoxy, during installation of pipelines in rocky terrain.Moreover, it is an object of the present invention to provide animproved coating that so protects the pipelines and any subcoatingswithout time consuming field installation.

Another object of the present invention is to provide an improvedcoating that salvages fusion bonded epoxy coated pipe in which"holidays" are formed in the fusion bonded epoxy coating by "slivers" inthe pipe.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide an improvedcoating that protects pipe, other metal members and metal structuresfrom abrasion and corrosion without the need of a corrosion protectionsubcoating.

A further object of the present invention is to provide an improvedcoating that insulates pipe, other metal members and metal structuresfrom electrical charges.

Additionally, it is an object of the present invention to provide animproved coating that protects pipe, other metal members, metalstructures and any subcoatings in high temperature environments.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In its preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to animproved polymer concrete coating for pipe, tubular shapes, other metalmembers, and metal structures comprising a mixture of an organic resinthat acts as a cementing agent, a filler material, and a chemicalactivator, which is applied to the outer surface of the metal member ina suitable thickness. The improved coating of the present invention maybe prepared by the process of combining and then heating the organicresin and filler material, mixing the combined organic resin and fillermaterial with the chemical activator to create the polymer concrete,spraying the polymer concrete on the item to be coated, and protectingthe polymer concrete coating for a polymerization period.

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other objects and advantages of the present invention arehereinafter set forth and explained with respect to the drawingswherein:

FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a pipe showing a corrosion protectioncoating thereon and the improved coating of the present inventionoverlaying the corrosion protection coating;

FIG. 2 is an isometric view of a pipe showing the improved coating ofthe present invention thereon, without any subcoatings;

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of a pipe showing a corrosionprotection coating thereon, a "holiday" formed in the corrosionprotection coating by a "sliver," and the repair of the "holiday"provided by the improved coating of the present invention;

FIG. 3a is an isometric view of a pipe showing a corrosion protectioncoating thereon, a "holiday" formed in the corrosion protection coatingby a "sliver," and the improved coating of the present inventionoverlaying the corrosion protection coating;

FIG. 4 is a schematic showing the heating of the combination of theorganic resin and the filler material and the mixing of the combinationof the organic resin and filler material with the chemical activator;

FIG. 4a is an isometric view showing the spraying of the improvedcoating of the present invention on the pipe shown in FIG. 1;

FIG. 4b is an isometric view showing the pipe shown in FIG. 1 turningafter being sprayed with the improved coating of the present invention;

FIG. 4c is an isometric view showing the pipe shown in FIGS. 1 and 4bbeing protected for a polymerization period after being sprayed with theimproved concrete of the present invention.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention is an improved electrically non-conductive,insulative, water resistant polymer concrete coating applied to pipe,tubular shapes, other metal members and metal structures. A preferredform of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 1. As shown in FIG.1, the exterior surface of a pipe 1 has a corrosion protection coating 2thereon, such as a fusion bonded epoxy coating, and a coating of theimproved polymer concrete of the present invention 3 on top of thecorrosion protection coating. The polymer concrete utilized in theimproved coating 2 of the present invention, described in more detailbelow, has been utilized in manufacturing the polymer concrete pipelinecasing insulators described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,736, more than oneyear before the filing date of this application.

The improved polymer concrete coating of the present invention comprisesa mixture of an organic resin that acts as a cementing agent, a fillermaterial and a chemical activator. The organic resin is preferably athermosetting polymer, such as an epoxy. Preferably, the organic resinis a mixture of a bisphenol A based epoxy and a polyglycol di-epoxide. Amixture composed of 40-60% by weight of a bisphenol A based epoxy, forexample, 50% by weight of EPON® Resin 826 described in TechnicalBulletin Shell Chemical Company, SC:235-82.826, Shell Chemical Company,3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 1230, Houston, Tex. 77027, and 40-60% byweight of a bisphenol A based epoxy blended with a polyglycol diepoxide,for example, 50% by weight Araldite® 508 Flexible Liquid Epoxy Resindescribed in CIBA-GEIGY Product Data, CR 474B4M14, Resins Department,CIBA-GEIGY Corporation, Three Skyline Drive, Hawthorne, N.Y. 10532, isknown to work. It is believed that an alternative organic resin mixtureis 60-75% by weight of a bisphenol A based epoxy and 25-40% by weight ofa polyglycol di-epoxide.

The chemical activator is preferably an amine, such as a polyamine orpolyamide. Aminoethylpiperazine is a chemical activator known to work.It is believed that an alternative chemical activator is tetraethylenepentamine.

The filler material is necessary to add bulk to the coating and decreasethe cost of the coating. Additionally, the filler material shouldimprove the physical properties of the improved polymer concrete coatingof the present invention. For example, it should absorb the exothermconnected with the chemical reaction of the organic resin with thechemical activator, thereby decreasing the possibility of cracking inthe coating. It should also decrease the chance of shrinkage andincrease the compressive and flexural strengths of the polymer concretecoating of the present invention. Finally, the filler material should bea size that allows the improved polymer concrete coating to be sprayed.For example, filler material of up to 200 mesh which is approximately127 microns in size is known to work. There are many filler materialsthat will satisfy these requirements. It is believed that acceptablefiller materials include calcium carbonate, silica flour, zeospherestalc and kaolin. It is known that calcium carbonate up to 200 mesh insize is an acceptable filler material.

The ratio, by weight, of the filler material to the organic resindescribed above is preferably between about 1:1 and 7:3. The ratio, byvolume, of the chemical activator to the combination of organic resindescribed above and filler material is preferably between about 1:8.75and 1:10.75. These ratios allow the improved polymer concrete of thepresent invention to be sprayed, while maintaining the improvedcharacteristics of the polymer concrete coating of the presentinvention, including its strong bond to fusion bonded epoxy, durability,electrical non-conductivity, insulative quality, and water resistance.

As shown in FIG. 1, the improved coating of the present invention may beapplied to metal members or structures that have been previously treatedwith a corrosion coating, such as fusion bonded epoxy. The fusion bondedepoxy coating should be clean and dry prior to applying the improvedpolymer concrete coating of the present invention. The improved polymerconcrete coating bonds extremely well to fusion bonded epoxy. The bondis such that a failure in the bond does not occur between the improvedpolymer concrete coating and the fusion bonded epoxy. When applied in asuitable thickness, for example, from about 10 mils to 1/2", theimproved polymer concrete coating is durable. Thus, the pipe or othermetal member and the corrosion coating are protected during potentiallydamaging and difficult installations. Moreover, because of its excellentbond to fusion bonded epoxy and its durability, it is believed that theimproved coating of the present invention will not disbond from fusionbonded epoxy over time and will continue to protect the pipe or othermetal member after installation.

More particularly, the improved coatings of the present inventionprotects pipe during "slick bore" installation at underground crossings,without greatly increasing the weight of the pipe and without increasingthe risk of damage to the pipe structure and any subcoating duringinstallation. The improved coating of the present invention may beapplied to the pipe at the same location that any corrosion protectionis applied. Thus, there is no additional transportation required toapply the improved coating of the present invention.

Additionally, the improved coating of the present inventions solves manyof the problems associated with portland cement coated pipe. A thicknessof 1/8" of the improved polymer concrete coating can be applied to a 40ft.-42" diameter pipe in one hour or less and the improved polymerconcrete coating sets within 24 hrs. Thus, the coating process takessignificantly less time than that required to coat pipe or other metalmembers with portland cement concrete. Because only a thin coat of theimproved polymer concrete is required, the increase in weight of thepipe due to the improved polymer concrete coating is minimal. Forexample, for a 42" diameter steel pipe, the improved polymer concretecoating need only be a maximum of approximately 1/8" thick, resulting inan increase in the weight of a 40 ft.-42" diameter steel pipe of onlyapproximately 500 lbs. A 1- 1/2"-2" coating of portland cement concrete,on the other hand, increases the weight of a 40 ft.-42" diameter steelpipe by approximately 11,500 lbs. A typical 40 ft.-42" diameter steelpipe weighs approximately 8,500 lbs. Thus, as compared with prior artportland cement concrete coatings, the pipe weight is much less,resulting in lower transportation costs and easier installation atunderground crossings.

Moreover, as compared with portland cement coated pipe, pipe coated withthe improved polymer concrete coating of the present invention is easierto install at underground crossings, because of its relative lightnessand smoother finish. The smoother finish results in a lower coefficientof friction, which combined with the relative lightness of pipe coatedwith the improved polymer concrete of the present invention makes iteasier to install. In short, because of the minimal increase in weight,the relatively smooth finish as compared with portland cement concretecoatings, the durability of the improved coating of the presentinvention, and the extremely strong bond of the improved coating of thepresent invention to fusion bonded epoxy, risk of damage to the pipestructure and any subcoating, such as fusion bonded epoxy, is minimal.

Similarly, the improved coating of the present invention protectspipelines and any subcoatings during installation in rocky terrain.Because it bonds extremely well to fusion bonded epoxy, a commonsubcoating it is believed that the improved coating of the presentinvention will not disbond during installation or use in rocky terrain.The improved coating of the present invention is typically not installedin the field, thereby eliminating the time and expense of labor in thefield. Finally, because of the hard, protective coating supplied by theimproved coating of the present invention, the pipe and any subcoatingis effectively protected during and after installation in rocky terrain.

Additionally, as shown in FIGS. 3 and 3a, because of its excellent bondto fusion bonded epoxy coatings, the improved coating of the presentinvention 3 may be used to salvage fusion bonded epoxy coated pipe inwhich the fusion bonded epoxy coating is riddled with "holidays" createdby "slivers," by applying the improved coating of the present inventionover the fusion bonded epoxy coating. As shown in FIGS. 3 and 3a, theexterior surface of a pipe 1 has a corrosion protection coating 2thereon, such as a fusion bonded epoxy coating, and a coating of theimproved polymer concrete of the present invention 3 on top of thecorrosion protection coating. Additionally, there is a "sliver" 4 in thepipe 1 creating a "holiday" 5 in the corrosion protection coating 2. Asshown in FIG. 3, the improved coating of the present invention 3 coversthe "sliver" 4 and repairs the "holiday" 5. Because of the extremelystrong bond between the improved coating of the present invention andfusion bonded epoxy, the improved coating of the present invention 3eliminates the "holidays" and, therefore, salvages the pipe forinstallation.

Additionally, because the improved coating of the present invention 3 iselectrically non-conductive, it is believed that, when applied in asuitable thickness, it may be used to insulate metal members orstructures from electrical charges.

Furthermore, because the improved coating of the present invention 3 iswater resistant and withstands high temperatures, it is believed that,when applied in a suitable thickness, it may be used to protect pipe,other metal members, metal structures, and any fusion bonded epoxysubcoatings in high temperature environments.

An alternative preferred embodiment of the improved polymer concretecoating of the present invention is shown in FIG. 2. With reference toFIG. 2, the improved coating of the present invention may be applied tometal members or structures that have not been previously treated with acorrosion coating. As shown in FIG. 2, the exterior surface of a pipe 1has a coating of the improved polymer concrete of the present invention3 thereon. There is no subcoating in FIG. 2. It is believed that theimproved coating of the present invention 3 by itself, when applied in asuitable thickness, will provide corrosion protection, as well asprotect the member during installation. Additionally, it is believedthat the other characteristics of the improved polymer concrete coatingof the present invention 3 described with respect to FIG. 1, such as itsdurability, electrical non-conductivity, insulative quality, and waterresistance, will be maintained when applied by itself in a suitablethickness.

As shown in FIGS. 4 through 4c, the improved coating of the presentinvention may be prepared by the process comprising the steps ofcombining and then heating the combination of organic resin and fillermaterial, mixing the combination of organic resin and filler materialwith the chemical activator to create the polymer concrete, spraying thepolymer concrete on the metal member or structure, and protecting thepolymer concrete coating for a polymerization period. The metal memberor structure so coated may or may not be previously coated with acorrosion protection coating, such as fusion bonded epoxy. As shown inFIG. 4, the combination of organic resin and filler material 6 is heatedby a heating means 7. The combination of the organic resin and fillermaterial 6 and the chemical activator 8 are pumped by pumping means 10and 11 to a mixer 9 where they are mixed together, resulting in thepolymer concrete of the improved coating of the present invention 3. Themixture of the resin and filler material is heated to a temperature ofpreferably about 120° F. to 180° F. During cold weather, the chemicalactivator is heated to a temperature of preferably about 70° F. to 120°F.

To aid in spraying the improved polymer concrete, the metal member maybe turned during the spraying process. For example, with reference toFIG. 4a, a pipe 1 is supported and turned by roller means 12 while theimproved coating of the present invention 3 is sprayed on the pipe 1 bysprayer means 13. Additionally, as shown in FIG. 4a, the improvedpolymer concrete coating 3 is preferably applied to all of the exteriorof the pipe 1 except a distance of between about 6" and 12" from theends of the pipe 1. Thus, the ends of the pipe 1 are free of the coatingand may be welded together when installed. Thereafter, the improvedpolymer concrete coating 3 may be applied at the installation site tothe pipe joint and uncoated ends of the pipes. The pipe 1 may be coatedwith the improved polymer concrete in situ by the process comprising thesteps of wrapping a collar or form around the welded joint and uncoatedends of the pipes, pouring the polymer concrete into the form or collar,allowing the concrete to polymerize, and removing the form or collar.

After the improved polymer concrete coating of the present invention 3is applied, the coated item may continue to be turned for an initialpolymerization period. As shown in FIG. 4b, a pipe 1 coated with theimproved coating of the present invention is supported and turned byroller means 12, during an initial polymerization period of the improvedcoating of the present invention 3. For example, after an improvedpolymer concrete coating of approximately 1/8" has been applied to a 42"diameter steel pipe, in temperatures above 70° F., the pipe is turnedfor an additional time period of about 30 minutes. Thereafter, the pipeor other metal member is stored so that the improved coating isprotected for the remainder of the polymerization period. For example,as shown in FIG. 4c, a pipe 1 coated with the improved coating of thepresent invention 3 is supported and protected by support means 14 whilethe improved coating of the present invention 3 is allowed topolymerize. The pipe may be stored outside during warm weather onsupports to protect the coating from the ground.

What is claimed is:
 1. A protective coating for metal members preparedby a process comprising the steps of:heating a combination of a fillermaterial and an organic resin, wherein the organic resin comprises about60-75% by weight of a bisphenol A based epoxy and between about 25-40%by weight of a polyglycol diepoxide; mixing the combination of theorganic resin and the filler material, wherein the ration by weight ofsaid filler material to said organic resin is between about 1:1 and 7:3with an amine, selected from a group consisting of aminoethylpiperazineand tetraethylenepentatmine, to create a polymer concrete; spraying thepolymer concrete on a metal member; and protecting the sprayed polymerconcrete from contact with other surfaces until it has polymerized.
 2. Aprotective coating for metal members prepared by the process as definedin claim 1, wherein the combination of the organic resin and the filleris heated to a temperature between 120° F. and 180° F.
 3. A protectivecoating for metal members prepared by the process as defined in claim 1,wherein the amine is heated to a temperature of between about 70° F. and120° F.
 4. A protective coating for metal members prepared by theprocess as defined in claim 1, wherein the metal member is turned whilesaid polymer concrete is sprayed on the metal member.
 5. A protectivecoating for metal members prepared by the process as defined in claim 1,wherein the ratio by weight of the organic resin and filler material tothe amine is between about 1:0.05 and 1:10.12.
 6. A protective coatingfor metal members prepared by the process as recited in claim 1, whereinorganic resin comprises: between about 40-60% of a bisphenol A basedepoxy, and; between about 40-60% of a bisphenol A based epoxy blendedwith a polyglycol di-epoxide.
 7. A protective coating for metal membersprepared by a process as recited in claim 1, wherein the organic resincomprises: between about 60-75% of a bisphenol A based epoxy, and;between about 25-40% of a polyglycol di-epoxide.
 8. A protective coatingfor metal members prepared by the process as defined in claim 1, whereinthe metal member has a coating of fusion bonded epoxy, and the polymerconcrete is sprayed on top of the coating of fusion bonded epoxy.